django dynamic multiple databases
Having said that, I have exactly this same issue, where I want to create a unique database for each user. The reason for doing this is I am offering the ability for the user to save/access to/from a database not stored on my server, which entails having multiple databases, and thus one for each user.
This answer is NOT the recommended way to achieve the desired goal. I would love to hear from a django-guru how to best approach this problem. However, this is a solution I have been using and it has worked well so far. I am using sqlite however it can be easily modified for any of the databases.
In summary, this is the process:
Add the new database to settings (at runtime)
Create a file to store these settings for reloading when the server is restarted (at runtime)
Run a script which loads the saved settings files (whenever the server is restarted)
Now, how to achieve this:
1) Firstly, when a new user is created, I create a new database in the settings. This code lives in my view where new users are created.
from YOUR_PROJECT_NAME import settings database_id = user.username #just something unique newDatabase = {} newDatabase["id"] = database_id newDatabase['ENGINE'] = 'django.db.backends.sqlite3' newDatabase['NAME'] = '/path/to/db_%s.sql' % database_id newDatabase['USER'] = '' newDatabase['PASSWORD'] = '' newDatabase['HOST'] = '' newDatabase['PORT'] = '' settings.DATABASES[database_id] = newDatabase save_db_settings_to_file(newDatabase) #this is for step 2)
This script loads the database settings 'at runtime' into the django project settings. However if the server is restarted, this database will no longer be in settings.
2) To facilitate reloading these settings automatically whenever the server is restarted, I create a file for each database which will be loaded whenever the server is started. Creating this file is performed by the function
save_db_settings_to_file
: def save_db_settings_to_file(db_settings): path_to_store_settings = "/path/to/your/project/YOUR_PROJECT_NAME/database_settings/" newDbString = """ DATABASES['%(id)s'] = { 'ENGINE': '%(ENGINE)s', # Add 'postgresql_psycopg2', 'mysql', 'sqlite3' or 'oracle'. 'NAME': '%(NAME)s', # Or path to database file if using sqlite3. 'USER': '', # Not used with sqlite3. 'PASSWORD': '', # Not used with sqlite3. 'HOST': '', # Set to empty string for localhost. Not used with sqlite3. 'PORT': '', # Set to empty string for default. Not used with sqlite3. } """ % db_settings file_to_store_settings = os.path.join(path_to_store_settings, db_settings['id'] + ".py") write_file(file_to_store_settings, newDbString) #psuedocode for compactness
3) To actually load these settings when the server is started, I add a single line to the very bottom of
/path/to/your/project/YOUR_PROJECT_NAME/settings.py
, which loads each file in the settings folder and runs it, having the effect of loading the database details into the settings. import settings_manager
Then,
import settings_manager
will load the file at /path/to/your/project/YOUR_PROJECT_NAME/settings_manager.py
, which contains the following code: from settings import DATABASES import os path_to_store_settings = "/path/to/your/project/YOUR_PROJECT_NAME/database_settings/" for fname in os.listdir(path_to_settings): full_path = os.path.join(path_to_settings, fname) f = open(full_path) content = f.read() f.close() exec(content) #you'd better be sure that the file doesn't contain anything malicious
Note that you could put this code directly at the bottom of settings.py instead of the import statement, but using the import statement keeps the abstraction level of settings.py consistent.
This is a convenient way to load each database setting because to remove a database from the settings all you have to do is delete the settings file, and the next time the server restarts it won't load those details into the settings, and the database will not be accessible.
As I said, this works and I have had success using it so far, but this is NOT the ideal solution. I would really appreciate if someone could post a better solution.
What's bad about it:
It explicitly defies advice from django team not to modify settings at runtime. I do not know the reason for why this advice is given.
It uses an
exec
statement to load the data into settings. This should be OK, but if you get some corrupt or malicious code in one of those files you will be a sad panda. Note that I still use the default database for auth and sessions data, but all the data from my own apps is stored in the user-specific database.
From: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6585373/django-multiple-and-dynamic-databases
이 내용에 흥미가 있습니까?
현재 기사가 여러분의 문제를 해결하지 못하는 경우 AI 엔진은 머신러닝 분석(스마트 모델이 방금 만들어져 부정확한 경우가 있을 수 있음)을 통해 가장 유사한 기사를 추천합니다:
다양한 언어의 JSONJSON은 Javascript 표기법을 사용하여 데이터 구조를 레이아웃하는 데이터 형식입니다. 그러나 Javascript가 코드에서 이러한 구조를 나타낼 수 있는 유일한 언어는 아닙니다. 저는 일반적으로 '객체'{}...
텍스트를 자유롭게 공유하거나 복사할 수 있습니다.하지만 이 문서의 URL은 참조 URL로 남겨 두십시오.
CC BY-SA 2.5, CC BY-SA 3.0 및 CC BY-SA 4.0에 따라 라이센스가 부여됩니다.